Old National Bank Balanced Scorecard
Fully Editable
Tailor To Your Needs In Excel Or Sheets
Professional Design
Trusted, Industry-Standard Templates
Pre-Built
For Quick And Efficient Use
No Expertise Is Needed
Easy To Follow
Make Smarter Expansion Decisions with the Full Report
This Old National Bank Balanced Scorecard Analysis gives you a structured view of the company's financial, customer, internal process, and learning-and-growth priorities. The page already shows a real preview of the actual analysis, so you can review the content before buying. Purchase the full version to get the complete ready-to-use report.
Benefits
Integrated Regional Synergies
Old National Bank's $53 billion asset base across Midwestern markets gives the scorecard a clean way to compare Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, and nearby states on the same yardstick. In 2025, that matters because post-merger integration only works if deposit growth, loan growth, and efficiency move together across regions. One set of metrics helps management spot where branches, teams, and systems are truly working as one.
Non-Interest Revenue Growth
Using the Customer and Financial perspectives, Old National Bank is pushing fee income from wealth management and capital markets, which helps reduce reliance on spread income. In 2025, the goal is to keep non-interest fees above 20% of operating revenue, a mix that improves stability when lending margins move. That matters because fee-led revenue is less tied to deposit and loan cycles, so it supports steadier returns.
Disciplined Credit Culture
Old National Bank's disciplined credit culture shows up in its 2025 results: net charge-offs stayed near 0.20% of average loans, which helped keep credit costs contained.
By tying asset quality targets to the Internal Process pillar, the bank protects its balance sheet and supports steady capital through Midwest economic swings.
That discipline matters in 2025, with nonperforming assets held low and reserve coverage kept strong versus peers.
Digital Transformation Velocity
Digital Transformation Velocity matters because Old National Bank's Learning and Growth measures show whether staff can adopt fintech tools and AI fast enough to lift output. Faster adoption cuts manual work, shortens process time, and supports the bank's target efficiency ratio of about 52% by late 2026. In practice, this scorecard area links training completion, tool use, and workflow automation to lower cost per dollar of revenue.
Local Community Alignment
Local Community Alignment measures how Old National Bank keeps CRA investment and local lending tied to the needs of its more than 200 branches. Strong scores here support deeper deposit loyalty, which matters because low-cost core deposits fund lending and reduce funding stress. In 2025, this kind of local scorecard focus helps protect franchise value by linking community trust to stable, long-term balances.
Old National's Scorecard: Growth, Credit Discipline, and Scale
Old National Bank's balanced scorecard gives management one view of growth, risk, and execution. In 2025, $53 billion in assets and net charge-offs near 0.20% of average loans show how the model links scale with credit discipline. It also helps protect fee income, branch performance, and digital adoption.
| 2025 metric | Value | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Assets | $53B | Scale comparison |
| Net charge-offs | ~0.20% | Credit control |
| Branches | 200+ | Local loyalty |
What is included in the product
Detailed Word Document
Editable Excel File
Drawbacks
Integration Reporting Lags
Integration reporting lags are a real weakness for Old National Bank because legacy core, loan, and treasury systems still feed the scorecard at different speeds. When data has to be reconciled across platforms, monthly performance packs can land several weeks after month-end, which blunts fast fixes. In 2025, that timing gap can also distort trend reads on key bank metrics like net interest margin, deposit mix, and credit quality, so leaders may act on stale results.
Operational Focus Rigidity
A 2025 efficiency-ratio target of 51% to 53% can make Old National Bank too cost-tight, so managers may cut back on core tech and process upgrades. That can delay needed spending on systems, data, and controls, even when those fixes lower risk and lift growth later. The result is short-term margin defense, but weaker operating flexibility and slower innovation.
Midwestern Economic Bias
Old National Bank's scorecard can overstate or understate health when it leans on Midwestern growth, because a regional swing may not match the broader U.S. bank cycle. In 2025, U.S. manufacturing stayed near the 50 PMI line, so a weak Midwest factory base can drag readings even if national demand is steadier. That same bias can hide concentration risk in manufacturing-heavy lending, where a 1% shift in local industrial output can hit credit quality fast.
Incentive Plan Complexity
Linking bonuses to more than 15 scorecard metrics makes Old National Bank's payout rules hard for frontline branch staff to follow. In practice, employees tend to chase simple sales volume because it is easier to see and control than multi-step quality scores, so balanced scorecard goals can get skewed. That gap can leave good 2025 results on paper but weaker customer quality and incentive payouts in the branch.
Subjective Scoring Gaps
Subjective scoring gaps make "culture" and "employee engagement" harder to trust than hard numbers like EPS, which is reported to the cent. Survey results often sit on 1-5 scales and can swing with low response rates, so branch managers may read 4.2/5 as strong while executives see weak execution. That gap can create real conflict when the same branch is judged on a soft score instead of clearer metrics like 2025 earnings per share.
Old National's Scorecard May Lag 2025 Reality
Old National Bank's balanced scorecard can lag reality when legacy data reaches teams late, so 2025 decisions may lean on stale month-end views of net interest margin, deposits, and credit quality. A 51% to 53% efficiency target can also push cost cuts too far, slowing tech and control spend. Regional and soft-score bias can further skew results, especially in branch incentives and culture ratings.
| Drawback | 2025 impact |
|---|---|
| Reporting lag | Weeks after month-end |
| Efficiency target | 51% to 53% |
| PMI context | Near 50 line |
Get Your Copy
Old National Bank Reference Sources
This preview shows the actual Old National Bank Balanced Scorecard Analysis document you'll receive after purchase. The full report is the same file, with complete structure, insights, and formatting. No sample version or placeholder content – just the real document, ready to use once checkout is complete.
Frequently Asked Questions
Old National uses this framework to manage its $55 billion asset portfolio by balancing financial outcomes with customer service and digital adoption. This strategic alignment ensures the bank meets its 12% return on equity target. By monitoring a mix of leading and lagging indicators, executives can adjust resources across its five-state footprint in real time.
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site - including articles or product references - constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.